Not “explore and infer.” A crosswalk.
Each thing the Head of Content & Curriculum, Education job description asks for, mapped to the exact artifact on this site that proves it. Verbatim from the posting, left; where it is answered, right.
A hiring panel should not have to reconstruct the argument. This is it, made explicit. The quotes on the left are verbatim from the live posting (captured 2026-07-11); the links on the right go to the working demonstration. The headline match is the tenth-from-last bullet — “a thesis about what teaching becomes when every learner has an adaptive AI tutor… here to build that” — because this whole site is that thesis, built rather than described.
| What the JD asks | Where it is answered |
|---|---|
| “Set and defend the quality bar for scaled education. Define what ‘great’ means precisely enough that the team can hit it without you in the room.” | The Standards → The AIHC v03 framework: 11 anchors, each written as a rising performance expectation across four bands — “great” made observable and hittable without the author present. |
| “The most exciting version of this role encodes its own craft into AI-powered systems rather than guarding it.” | The Playbook → The two-timescale architecture: human craft encoded once into the exemplar + rigor rubric, and Claude generates every lesson against them. The craft is in the system, not the person. |
| “determine where human craft is non-negotiable… Where that line sits, and how it moves as models improve, is yours to figure out.” | The Thesis → The trust line treated as an environmental-design decision, re-derived as models improve — the standards’ ‘moving line’ (X2) and trust-calibration anchor (B3) operationalize it. |
| “You have a thesis about what teaching becomes when every learner has an adaptive AI tutor, and you’re here to build that, not a better version of the old thing.” | This entire site → This is that thesis, built. A personal AI tutor that teaches on the learner’s real work, one standard at a time — demonstrated end to end, not described. |
| “increasingly personalized, not templated courseware” · “learning that adapts to each person and scales far past what any team could produce by hand.” | The Learner Tracks → Forty-eight lessons, each generated on a specific learner’s real work — no two alike. Swap the learner and the Do’s and exit tickets change materially. |
| “every audience (developers, consumers, enterprise admins, the general public)” | Four learner tracks → One fictional learner per named audience — Maya (developer), Devon (enterprise admin), Priya (consumer), Frank (general public) — each a full 12-lesson arc. |
| “coordinate them as one production engine rather than a chain of handoffs.” | The Playbook & Standards → The generation pipeline and the orchestration anchor (D1): composed workers, gates, and handoffs run as one accountable system, not a relay. |
| “You’re rigorous about measurement and grounded in learning science. You define what ‘working’ means… instrument for it, and act on what you find.” | The Protocol & the ledgers → An NGSS/CCSS-grounded method; a derivation chain you can audit; and per-learner ledgers where ‘working’ is transfer and mastery-by-standard, not completion. |
| “you design for durability and fast regeneration rather than perfecting artifacts that models will outdate.” | The Protocol & Regeneration → Versioned, deprecable, re-derivable standards (D2); superseded versions deprecate, never delete. This very site regenerates from source with one build command. |
| “at a minimum you can read code, you know what good looks like, and you can coach your technical team members.” | Maya’s track → A full Claude Code × AI-agents developer track — subagent contracts, verification, orchestration — taught at the code level. |
| “Encoding your taste into systems and workflows that produce far beyond what your own hands could.” | The Evidence → The taste is not asserted — it is 1,702 adjudicated receipts distilled into 52 practice families, the encoded craft the standards are built from. |
The role asks for someone who encodes teaching craft into systems. This site is the proof of exactly that.
A thesis, a standard, its evidence, the playbook that generates from it, and forty-eight lessons it produced — built the way the standards say to build, in the founder’s own brand. Start anywhere.